Skip to main content

Table 1 Methods used in recent papers examining non-traditional circadian oscillators.

From: Standards of evidence in chronobiology: A response

Study

Lesion type

Done in DD?

Measure of Entrainment

Deprivation period

Homeostatic increase in measure?

Clock gene deletion studies in RF

Fuller et al., 2008 (2)

Bmal1 ko

DD

Tb and LMA

Yes, 24 hrs, no anticipation in RF

No, reduced Tb and LMA

Mistlberger al., 2008 (9)

Bmal1 ko

Mainly DD

Motion sensor

Ad lib after RF shows no entrainment

Yes, increased activity in RF

Pendergast et al., 2009 (11)

Bmal1 ko

LD and DD

Wheel running

Yes, 48 hrs, no clear entrainment

Yes, increased running in RF and food deprivation

Storch and Weitz, 2009 (10)

multiple clock genes

LD and DD

Wheel running

Not done

Yes, increased running in RF

Clock gene deletion study in MASCO

Mohawk et al., 2009 (15)

Multiple clock genes

Mainly DD

Motion sensor for Bmal1; wheel running for rest

Not done

Yes, increased running after MA ingestion

DMH lesion studies in RF

Gooley et al., 2006 (8)

excitotoxic

LD only

Tb and LMA

Yes, 44 hrs, after RF

No, reduced Tb and LMA in RF

Landry et al., 2006 (5)

electrolytic

LD only

Motion sensor

Yes, 51 hrs after RF

Yes, increased activity in RF

Landry et al., 2007 (4)

electrolytic

LD only

Motion sensor

Yes, 72 hrs after RF

Yes, increased activity in RF

Moriya et al., 2009 (6)

electrolytic

LD, + DD test days

Motion sensor Tb, LMA

Yes, 46 or 58 hrs, but only first day shown

Does not say (activity normalized)