Open Access

Circadian behavior of mice deficient in PER1/PML or PER2/PML

  • Takao Miki1, 2,
  • Misty Chen-Goodspeed1,
  • Zhaoyang Zhao1 and
  • Cheng Chi Lee1Email author
Journal of Circadian Rhythms201311:9

DOI: 10.1186/1740-3391-11-9

Received: 7 February 2013

Accepted: 26 May 2013

Published: 28 August 2013



Our recent studies demonstrate that the murine homolog of the human tumor suppressor promyelocytic leukemia (PML) regulates circadian behavior of mice. To further gather insight into PML’s contribution to circadian behavior, we generated two strains of mice deficient in one of the two period (Per) genes and the PML gene, with Per1 −/− /Pml −/− and Per2 −/− /Pml −/− genotypes.


Here we report the circadian behavior of these mice based on wheel-running behavioral analysis. In a free-running environment, the Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice maintained circadian rhythm but displayed a significantly shorter period of 22.2 h. In addition, these mice displayed significantly enhanced phase response to a light pulse given at zeitgeber time (ZT) 14 and 22. The Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice lose persistent rhythm when in a free-running environment, as also the case for Per2 −/− mice. A transient post-light pulse rhythm seen in the arrhythmic Per2 −/− mice was less apparent in Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice. Both the Per1 −/− /Pml −/− and Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice displayed a more advanced phase angle of entrainment activity during light–dark cycles than the single gene deficient mice.


Beyond merely regulating PER1 and PER2, the current behavioral studies suggest PML has additional roles in mouse circadian behavior.


Circadian rhythm Mouse model Actogram Phase shift Period


The protein, Promyelocytic leukemia (PML) has been implicated in many important biological processes, including the DNA damage response, cell division control and chromosome instability [1, 2]. A reciprocal chromosomal translocation t(15;17), which fuses the PML and the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) genes is the underlying cause of over 95% of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cases [1]. Recently, we have shown that PML is a circadian clock regulator [3]. Loss of PML disrupts PER2 nuclear localization and dampens PER2 interaction with the clock transcriptional complex BMAL1/CLOCK, resulting in reduced heterodimer mediated transcription. Our studies show that Pml −/− mice have abnormal phase shift responses to a light pulse and have circadian periods that display reduced precision and stability. The period length instability had features that were somewhat similar to the behavioral phenotype described for Per1 −/− mice [4, 5]. At a molecular level, we observed that the loss of PML caused significantly dampened expression of Per1[3]. These observations raised the possibility that the phenotype of PML deficiency may be linked to deregulation of PER1 function. However, PML regulation of PER2 function could also explain the dampened Per1 expression profile in Pml −/− mice since the loss of PER2 was shown to dampen Per1 expression [6]. To examine these possibilities, we generated Per1 −/− /Pml −/− and Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice to investigate whether the circadian behavior of these double knockout mice was similar to that of Pml −/− , Per1 −/− , Per2 −/− or wild type mice. Our circadian behavioral analysis based on wheel-running activities revealed that loss of PML further compromised the clock function of both Per1 −/− or Per2 −/− mice indicating that PML has a significant role in the mammalian clock mechanism.

Materials and methods

Animal wheel-running activity

All mice were housed in a standard animal maintenance facility under a 12 h light: 12 h dark (LD) cycle. The Pml −/− (129sv) animals were obtained from the Mouse Models of Human Cancers Consortium repository, National Cancer Institute [7]. The mPer2 −/− (129sv/C57/b6) and Per1 −/− (129sv/C57/b6) mice were generated as previously described [4]. Mice deficient in either PML/PER1 or PML/PER2 were generated by initially breeding Pml −/− with Per1 −/− or Per2 −/− animals to produce the heterozygote F1. The double mutant animals for Per1 −/− /Pml −/− or Per2 −/− /Pml −/− were then obtained from heterozygote F1 breeding and were genotyped by PCR with primers specific to the respective genes. The Per1 −/− , Pml −/− and Per2 −/− mice used for these behavioral studies were derived from this breeding scheme. Both male and female mice deficient in either Per1 −/− /Pml −/− or Per2 −/− /Pml −/− were viable, fertile and were morphologically indistinguishable from wild type. Male siblings of the respective genotypes aged about 16 weeks from the backcross were used in the wheel-running studies. Wheel-running activity was monitored as described [6]. Briefly, mice were initially entrained to a LD cycle for at least 2 weeks, followed by their release into a constant darkness free-running condition. To assess the stability of the clock, the same mice were re-entrained to an LD cycle for 2 weeks and then released again into a free-running environment. For phase shift studies, the protocol was as previously described [8, 9]. Briefly, a light pulse of 15 min with an intensity of 480lux was given using white fluorescent tube light. A linear regression using data from at least 10 days following the light pulse was used to determine the level of phase shift. Zeitgeber time zero (ZT0) is light on and ZT12 is light off.

All animal experiments in this study were carried out under an institutional approved animal protocol: HSC-AWC-06-077.


Wheel-running circadian behavior of Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice

Male wild type, Pml −/− , Per1 −/− and Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice were analyzed for their circadian behavior by monitoring their wheel-running activity in a LD cycle followed by a free-running period of 12 h dark/12 h dark (DD) cycles. For all four genotypes, the mice entrained to an LD cycle and were rhythmic in the free-running environment throughout our analysis. Interestingly, when released into a free-running state, the Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice displayed an “after effect of entrainment” where their daily period gradually shortened over the initial 20 days (Figure 1A, B). The period lengths of Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice were eventually shortened to an average 22.2 h in the free-running environment (Figure 1B). The Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice period lengths from day 20–40 and 20–60 were not significantly different. Under a free-running environment, the wild type, Per1 −/− and Pml −/− mice displayed periods that averaged 23.4, 22.8 and 23.2 h, respectively (Table 1). The Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice displayed a significant level of activity prior to light off at ZT12 during the LD cycle (Figure 1A, also see Figure 2). On average, the Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mouse phase angle of entrainment activity onset in the LD cycle started about 1.5 h prior to ZT12 (Figure 3). To a much lesser extent, the Per1 −/− mice displayed some activity prior to ZT12 consistent with previous observations [9]. Wild type and Pml −/− mice showed no significant wheel-running activity before light off at ZT12. The current observations indicate that Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice have a significantly advanced phase angle of entrainment compared to Pml −/− , Per1 −/− or wildtype mice during LD cycles.
Figure 1

Wheel-running behavior of Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice. The wheel-running actograms are double plotted showing a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (LD) and a free-running period of 12 h dark/12 h dark (DD) cycles. Transition from LD to DD is indicated by the marker. Actograms are representative of (A) a wild type mouse, a Per1 −/− , a Pml −/− and a Per1 −/− / Pml −/− mouse. (B) Summary of periods obtained from wild type (n = 7) and Per1 −/− / Pml −/− (n = 12) mice over 1–20, 20–40 and 40–60 days in a free-running environment. Error bar indicates SEM.* p < 0.05.

Figure 2

Phase shift behavior of Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice. Mice were entrained to a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (LD) and a light pulse was given on the last day of LD at ZT 14 or ZT 22. (A) &(B) Phase delay response to a ZT14 light pulse (15 min) of wild type, Per1 −/− , Pml −/− and Per1 −/−/Pml −/− mice. (C) &(D) Phase advance response to a ZT22 light pulse (15 min) of wild type, Per1 −/− , Pml −/− and Per1 −/−/Pml −/− mice. Error bar indicates SEM. p < 0.05, (n = 9).

Figure 3

Average time of activity onset during LD cycles. The average time of activity onset over 14 days before ZT12 was measured for wildtype, Per1 −/− , Pml −/− , Per1 −/− /Pml −/− and Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice. Activity onset for Per2 −/− and Per1 −/− mice was previously reported by Spoelstra et al., 2004. Error bar indicates SEM. *p < 0.05, (n = 6).

Table 1

Comparison of periods and light pulse responses in mice with different genotype



Light pulse ZT14

Light pulse ZT22

[phase delay]

[phase advance]

Hours (SEM)

Hours (SEM)

Hours (SEM)

WT (n = 6)

23.6 (0.1)

1.3 (0.1)

0.8 (0.2)

PER1 (n = 4)

22.8 (0.2)

1.5 (0.2)

0.5 (0.2)

PER2 (n = 8)




PML (n = 12)

23.2 (0.2)

1.0 (0.1)

0.9 (0.3)

PER1/PML (n = 23)

22.2 (0.2)

2.0 (0.2)

1.5 (0.3)

PER2/PML (n = 6)




Next we examined whether the phase shift behavior of Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice was different from that of wild type, Pml −/− or Per1 −/− mice. A protocol in which the light pulse was given at either ZT14 or ZT22 on the last day of entrainment and prior to release into a free-running environment was used [8, 9]. With this protocol, wildtype mice displayed a −1.3 ± 0.1 h and +0.8 h ± 0.2 h phase delay and phase advance response to ZT14 and ZT22 light pulses, respectively (Table 1). The Per1 −/− mice displayed a −1.5 ± 0.2 h and +0.5 h ± 0.3 h phase delay and phase advance response to ZT14 and ZT22 light pulses, respectively. The Pml −/− mice displayed a −1.0 ± 0.1 h and +0.9 h ± 0.3 h phase delay and phase advance response to ZT14 and ZT22 light pulses, respectively. The Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice displayed a −2.0 h ± 0.2 h and +1.5 h ± 0.3 h phase delay and phase advance response, respectively (Figure 2A-D, Table 1). These observations demonstrate that the Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice have a significantly altered phase shift response, shorter average period length and increased advance of phase angle of entrainment when compared to wild type, Pml −/− or Per1 −/− mice. Together, these behavioral observations indicate that the loss of PML and PER1 functions further altered the mammalian clock in vivo from that observed for the single gene mutant mice.

Circadian behavior of Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice

Next we examined the circadian behavior of Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice using a similar wheel-running analysis. When released into a free-running environment, some of the Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice displayed a transient rhythm that deteriorated into arrhythmic activities (Figure 4A-C). These behaviors were also observed in Per2 −/− mice. Previous studies of Per2 m/m mice described a similar behavioral phenotype [6]. This similarity in the Per2 −/− and Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice behavior suggests that the primary cause of the loss of rhythm behavioral phenotype in the free-running state is a loss of PER2 function. On the other hand, all arrhythmic Per2 −/− mice (n = 4) treated with a light pulse transiently returned to rhythmic behavior, as previously observed (Figure 4B) [9]. However, the transient post-light pulse rhythm seen in the arrhythmic Per2 −/− mice was not apparent in 50% of arrhythmic Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice (n = 4) that were similarly treated (Figure 4C). These observations suggest that the endogenous clock of Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice is further compromised from that of Per2 −/− mice.
Figure 4

Wheel-running behavior of Per2 −/− , Pml −/− and Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice. The wheel-running actograms are double plotted showing a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle (LD) and a free-running period of 12 h dark/12 h dark (DD) cycles. The marker identifies the transition from LD to DD. Light pulse (LP) is indicated by the red asterisk. Actograms are representative of (A) a wild type mouse, (B) two representative Per2 −/− mice, (C) a representative Pml −/− mouse, and (D) two representative Per2 −/− / Pml −/− mice. Note the level of increased activity onset prior to ZT12 in the LD cycle.

The phase shift response of Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice was also examined using a similar protocol in which a light pulse was given at either ZT14 or ZT22 on the last day of entrainment prior to release into a free-running environment. The phase shift response could not be determined accurately due to immediate loss of rhythm in many of the Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice when released into a free-running condition. Comparing Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice to Per2 −/− mice, it was apparent that the Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice were much more active in the LD cycle (Figure 4C). The daily activity onset of Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice in an LD cycle was highly variable and changed from day to day, unlike that seen in Per2 −/− mice (Figure 4B, C). On average, the phase angle of entrainment was about 2.5 h prior to ZT12 (Figure 3). This is significantly greater than the value of 0.4 h prior to ZT12 previously reported for Per2 m/m mice [9]. These observations suggest that the robustness of LD entrainment is affected and the phase angle of entrainment is also advanced when mice are deficient in both PER2 and PML when compared to PER2 or PML deficient mice.


Core clock genes are primarily defined by the altered circadian behavioral phenotype when the gene is mutated in an organism. In the current paradigm, a core clock gene deficiency is likely to disrupt circadian behavior in a drastic manner, while a clock-controlled gene deficiency is unlikely to have an impact on circadian behavior. However, in mammals, this differentiation is complicated by the presence of redundant homologs of core clock genes. Existing evidence appears to show that single gene mutations in mice rarely result in a total disruption of the endogenous clock. One possible exception is Bmal1 and to a lesser extent Per2, where a loss of function mutation can result in arrhythmic phenotypes [6, 10]. Surprisingly, constitutive expression of Bmal2 in Bmal1 −/− mice restored circadian rhythmicity [11]. The loss of rhythm phenotype of Bmal1 −/− is linked to BMAL1 regulation of Bmal2 expression. For other identified core clock genes in mice, gene redundancy prevents loss of circadian rhythm when a key clock gene is mutated. In some instances, the endogenous clock rhythm can be as robust as wildtype, such as in CLOCK or NPAS2 null deficiency [12, 13]. Similar findings were also observed for REV-ERBα or REV-ERBβ deficiency [14]. Other outcomes seen in core clock gene deficiency are shortening or lengthening of period length, as in the loss of CRY1 and CRY2, respectively. The characteristics of PER1 and PER2 deficiency phenotype is an unstable period and a clock with a transient shortened period that lose persistence in rhythm, respectively. In free-running conditions, double knockout mice with either CLOCK/NPAS2 [15], REV-ERBα/REV-ERBβ [14], CRY1/CRY2 [16] or PER1/PER2 [4] deficiency displayed arrhythmic locomotor behavior indicating that the endogenous clock machinery was completely disrupted. The loss of DEC1 (SHARP2) and its redundant paralog DEC2 (SHARP1) mildly impacted clock entrainment [17]. At a molecular level, decreased expression amplitude of key clock regulators in the SCN and peripheral organs was observed. The phenotype and molecular profiles of DEC1 (SHARP2) and DEC2 (SHARP1) deficient mice are consistent with a central clock mechanism that is largely intact. Possible explanations are that these are players in a minor clock regulatory loop or perhaps they are clock-controlled genes.

The clock behavioral rhythm based on wheel-running activities revealed that mice deficient in both PML and PER1 have significant abnormalities of their endogenous clock. Some of the circadian behavior abnormality appeared significantly different from circadian behaviors of either Pml −/− , Per1 −/− or wild type mice. Two previous studies showed that the phase delay of our Per1 −/− mice was similar to that of wildtype mice, while the phase advance was moderately reduced [8, 9]. Our new analysis confirmed these previous observations. In contrast, the Pml −/− /Per1 −/− mice described here displayed significant differences in period length, phase shift response and phase angle of entrainment from those of Pml −/− , Per1 −/− or wild type mice.

The arrhythmic free-running behaviors of Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice are similar to those of Per2 deficient mice [6]. However, the restoration of transient rhythm by a light pulse during arrhythmic behavior of Per2 −/− mice in a free-running state was less apparent in Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice [9]. In addition, Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice displayed a significantly more advanced phase angle of entrainment in an LD cycle than Per2 −/− mice. Together, the behavioral analysis suggests that the loss of PML caused additional perturbation to the already compromised Per2 −/− or Per1 −/− clock mechanism.

Our previous studies showed that loss of PML significantly decreased PER2 nuclear entry, which in turn reduced its interaction with BMAL1 and CLOCK [3]. Other studies have indicated that PML directly interacts with BMAL1 [18]. These observations suggest that PML likely modulates BMAL1/CLOCK mediated transcription of its target genes. Indeed, using Per1-Luc reporter assay, we observed that PML enhanced BMAL1/CLOCK mediated transcription of the Per1 promoter (data not shown). In addition to BMAL1 and PER2, a growing list of PML interacting proteins including SIRT1, CBP, WDR5 and SIN3A have been reported to interact with key clock regulators or be involved in the circadian clock mechanism [1922]. Thus, the additional clock behavioral defects of Per2 −/− /Pml −/− or Per1 −/− /Pml −/− mice, in contrast to the individual gene deficient mice, suggest that PML likely regulates additional regulators of the mammalian clock mechanism.


The current studies show that the circadian behavior of Per1 −/− /Pml −/− and Per2 −/− /Pml −/− mice differs significantly from that of Per1 −/− , Per2 −/− and Pml −/− mice, suggesting that PML has additional roles in mouse circadian clock beyond merely regulating PER1 and PER2. These observations based on behavioral analysis suggest that PML’s regulatory role in the mouse clock mechanism may involve multiple targets.



We thank Dr. J. Lever for reading the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston
Currently at Department of Molecular Oncology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine


  1. Salomoni P, Pandolfi PP: The role of PML in tumor suppression. Cell 2002, 108:165–170.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP: Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007,8(December):1006–1016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Miki T, Xu Z, Chen-Goodspeed M, Liu M, Van Oort-Jansen A, Rea M a, Zhao Z, Lee CC, Chang K-S: PML regulates PER2 nuclear localization and circadian function. EMBO J 2012, 31:1427–1439.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Zheng B, Albrecht U, Kaasik K, Sage M, Lu W, Vaishnav S, Li Q, Sun ZS, Eichele G, Bradley A, Lee CC: Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock. Cell 2001, 105:683–694.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cermakian N, Monaco L, Pando MP, Dierich A, Sassone-corsi P: Altered behavioral rhythms and clock gene expression in mice with a targeted mutation in the Period1 gene. EMBO J 2001, 20:3967–3974.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zheng B, Larkin DW, Albrecht U, Sun ZS, Sage M, Eichele G, Lee CC, Bradley A: The mPer2 gene encodes a functional component of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature 1999, 400:169–173.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gang Wang Z: Role of PML in cell growth and the retinoic acid pathway. Science 1998, 279:1547–1551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Albrecht U, Zheng B, Larkin D, Sun ZS, Lee CC: mPer1 and mPer2 are essential for normal resetting of the circadian clock. J Biol Rhythms 2001, 16:100–104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Spoelstra K, Albrecht U, Van der Horst GTJ, Brauer V, Daan S: Phase responses to light pulses in mice lacking functional per or cry genes. J Biol Rhythms 2004, 19:518–529.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunger MK, Wilsbacher LD, Moran SM, Clendenin C, Radcliffe LA, Hogenesch JB, Simon MC, Takahashi JS, Bradfield CA: Mop3 is an essential component of the master circadian pacemaker in mammals. Cell 2000, 103:1009–1017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Shi S, Hida A, Mcguinness OP, Wasserman DH, Yamazaki S: Circadian clock gene Bmal1 is not essential; functional replacement with its Paralog, Bmal2. Curr Biol 2010, 20:316–321.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Debruyne JP, Noton E, Lambert CM, Maywood ES, Weaver DR, Reppert SM: A clock shock: mouse CLOCK is not required for circadian oscillator function. Neuron 2006, 50:465–477.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia J a: Impaired cued and contextual memory in NPAS2-deficient Mice. Science 2000, 288:2226–2230.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cho H, Zhao X, Hatori M, Yu RT, Barish GD, Lam MT, Chong L, Ditacchio L, Atkins AR, Glass CK, Liddle C, Auwerx J, Downes M, Panda S, Evans RM: Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-α and REV-ERB-β. Nature 2012, 485:123–127.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. DeBruyne JP, Weaver DR, Reppert SM: CLOCK and NPAS2 have overlapping roles in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:543–545.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Vitaterna MH, Selby CP, Todo T, Niwa H, Thompson C, Fruechte EM, Hitomi K, Thresher RJ, Ishikawa T, Miyazaki J, Takahashi JS, Sancar A: Differential regulation of mammalian period genes and circadian rhythmicity by cryptochromes 1 and 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999, 96:12114–12119.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Rossner MJ, Oster H, Wichert SP, Reinecke L, Wehr MC, Reinecke J, Eichele G, Taneja R, Nave K: Disturbed clockwork resetting in Sharp-1 and Sharp-2 single and double mutant mice. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2762.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee J, Lee Y, Lee MJ, Park E, Kang SH, Chung CH, Lee KH, Kim K: Dual modification of BMAL1 by SUMO2/3 and ubiquitin promotes circadian activation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex. Mol Cell Biol 2008, 28:6056–6065.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown SA, Ripperger J, Kadener S, Fleury-Olela F, Vilbois F, Rosbash M, Schibler U: PERIOD1-associated proteins modulate the negative limb of the mammalian circadian oscillator. Science 2005, 308:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakahata Y, Kaluzova M, Grimaldi B, Sahar S, Hirayama J, Chen D, Guarente LP, Sassone-Corsi P: The NAD + −dependent deacetylase SIRT1 modulates CLOCK-mediated chromatin remodeling and circadian control. Cell 2008, 134:329–340.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee Y, Lee J, Kwon I, Nakajima Y, Ohmiya Y, Son GH, Lee KH, Kim K: Coactivation of the CLOCK-BMAL1 complex by CBP mediates resetting of the circadian clock. J Cell Sci 2010,123(Pt 20):3547–3557.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Duong HA, Robles MS, Knutti D, Weitz CJ: A molecular mechanism for circadian clock negative feedback. Science 2011, 332:1436–1439.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Miki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.